> "premiereopera@aol.com" <edopera@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ffa1474a-35e8-4141-bd61-b66677d88445@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 5, 11:08 pm, dar...@live.com wrote:
>> On Jul 5, 9:06 pm, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop...@gmail.com> wrote:> On
>> Jul 5, 2:01 pm, dar...@live.com wrote:
>>
>> Ed,
>> I can't believe after making me wait more than three months for an
>> order and after not canceling my order and refunding my money, after
>> two and a half weeks of almost daily requests, that YOU would have the
>> gall to criticize ME about anything!
>>
>> After searching the internet last week and finding this group, I
>> realized that you had, at least at one time, posted here. So, yes, my
>> posting the details of this pathetic and still ongoing fiasco was done
>> in part to warn others but, also, in the hopes that you might be
>> embarrassed into finally doing the right thing. Nothing else had
>> seemed to work.
>>
>> As for the "disorganized mess" comment, I thought I was being
>> complimentary, Ed. For after all, if you aren't that, then what excuse
>> do you have left for stringing me along as you have, with occasional
>> email responses, promising to cancel my order and refund my money and,
>> still, nothing?
>>
>> You say you won't communicate with me anymore. Ed, I'm sick and tired
>> of communicating with you, too, either privately or through this
>> group. I just want my money back. Is that too difficult for you to
>> understand? That's all this is about.
>>
>> And the funny thing is, Ed, at this point in the thread, I thought I
>> was helping you out, in fact, by showing that you're still saying
>> you'll make good on your promise. I really thought that my plan to
>> update the thread after getting a check would be in fact a good thing
>> for you.
>>
>> But that's fine, if that's the way you want it. I won't update the
>> thread with that information. But, Ed, I do promise that I will update
>> the thread if I don't get that check by next week. You need to look
>> yourself in the mirror and face the fact that you drove me to posting
>> this information in the first place. How many countless emails have I
>> sent you over the past four months, and specifically since 6/18, when
>> I first asked you to refund my money? All you had to do, and all you
>> still have to do, is demonstrate that you're a legitimate and honest
>> businessman. I've done nothing to you, but, up till now, you've only
>> dealt dishonestly with me. I'm guessing you probably thought that just
>> shipping the order anyway a couple of days ago, and ignoring my many
>> cancellation requests, would somehow make things right, though I don't
>> know why you would think so.
>>
>> Ed, for the millionth time, just send me my check and let's be done
>> with this. The ball has always been in your court.
>
> This is not the millionth time you have asked for a check. It is
> exactly the second time. The first time was earlier today. You certain
> deal in exaggerations and half truths. I have NOT dealt dishonestly
> with you. You are just using this ng as a big crybaby sounding board,
> thinking I would not answer. Well, I did break my word and answer, but
> that's because you have slandered my name and that of my company. If
> you think "disorganized mess" is complimentary, I suggest you look up
> the meaning of the word. So, to use your arithmatic, for the millionth
> time, this is not the place for this.
> Ed
>
> So he has not been waiting for THREE MONTHS for his product????? Wagner
> Fan
shown.
André E. Storfer