"premiereopera@aol.com" <edopera@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ffa1474a-35e8-4141-bd61-b66677d88445@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 5, 11:08 pm, dar...@live.com wrote:
> On Jul 5, 9:06 pm, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop...@gmail.com> wrote:> On
> Jul 5, 2:01 pm, dar...@live.com wrote:
>
> Ed,
> I can't believe after making me wait more than three months for an
> order and after not canceling my order and refunding my money, after
> two and a half weeks of almost daily requests, that YOU would have the
> gall to criticize ME about anything!
>
> After searching the internet last week and finding this group, I
> realized that you had, at least at one time, posted here. So, yes, my
> posting the details of this pathetic and still ongoing fiasco was done
> in part to warn others but, also, in the hopes that you might be
> embarrassed into finally doing the right thing. Nothing else had
> seemed to work.
>
> As for the "disorganized mess" comment, I thought I was being
> complimentary, Ed. For after all, if you aren't that, then what excuse
> do you have left for stringing me along as you have, with occasional
> email responses, promising to cancel my order and refund my money and,
> still, nothing?
>
> You say you won't communicate with me anymore. Ed, I'm sick and tired
> of communicating with you, too, either privately or through this
> group. I just want my money back. Is that too difficult for you to
> understand? That's all this is about.
>
> And the funny thing is, Ed, at this point in the thread, I thought I
> was helping you out, in fact, by showing that you're still saying
> you'll make good on your promise. I really thought that my plan to
> update the thread after getting a check would be in fact a good thing
> for you.
>
> But that's fine, if that's the way you want it. I won't update the
> thread with that information. But, Ed, I do promise that I will update
> the thread if I don't get that check by next week. You need to look
> yourself in the mirror and face the fact that you drove me to posting
> this information in the first place. How many countless emails have I
> sent you over the past four months, and specifically since 6/18, when
> I first asked you to refund my money? All you had to do, and all you
> still have to do, is demonstrate that you're a legitimate and honest
> businessman. I've done nothing to you, but, up till now, you've only
> dealt dishonestly with me. I'm guessing you probably thought that just
> shipping the order anyway a couple of days ago, and ignoring my many
> cancellation requests, would somehow make things right, though I don't
> know why you would think so.
>
> Ed, for the millionth time, just send me my check and let's be done
> with this. The ball has always been in your court.
This is not the millionth time you have asked for a check. It is
exactly the second time. The first time was earlier today. You certain
deal in exaggerations and half truths. I have NOT dealt dishonestly
with you. You are just using this ng as a big crybaby sounding board,
thinking I would not answer. Well, I did break my word and answer, but
that's because you have slandered my name and that of my company. If
you think "disorganized mess" is complimentary, I suggest you look up
the meaning of the word. So, to use your arithmatic, for the millionth
time, this is not the place for this.
Ed
So he has not been waiting for THREE MONTHS for his product????? Wagner Fan