On Jul 5, 11:08 pm, dar...@live.com wrote:
> On Jul 5, 9:06 pm, "premiereop...@aol.com" <edop...@gmail.com> wrote:> On Jul 5, 2:01 pm, dar...@live.com wrote:
>
> Ed,
> I can't believe after making me wait more than three months for an
> order and after not canceling my order and refunding my money, after
> two and a half weeks of almost daily requests, that YOU would have the
> gall to criticize ME about anything!
>
> After searching the internet last week and finding this group, I
> realized that you had, at least at one time, posted here. So, yes, my
> posting the details of this pathetic and still ongoing fiasco was done
> in part to warn others but, also, in the hopes that you might be
> embarrassed into finally doing the right thing. Nothing else had
> seemed to work.
>
> As for the "disorganized mess" comment, I thought I was being
> complimentary, Ed. For after all, if you aren't that, then what excuse
> do you have left for stringing me along as you have, with occasional
> email responses, promising to cancel my order and refund my money and,
> still, nothing?
>
> You say you won't communicate with me anymore. Ed, I'm sick and tired
> of communicating with you, too, either privately or through this
> group. I just want my money back. Is that too difficult for you to
> understand? That's all this is about.
>
> And the funny thing is, Ed, at this point in the thread, I thought I
> was helping you out, in fact, by showing that you're still saying
> you'll make good on your promise. I really thought that my plan to
> update the thread after getting a check would be in fact a good thing
> for you.
>
> But that's fine, if that's the way you want it. I won't update the
> thread with that information. But, Ed, I do promise that I will update
> the thread if I don't get that check by next week. You need to look
> yourself in the mirror and face the fact that you drove me to posting
> this information in the first place. How many countless emails have I
> sent you over the past four months, and specifically since 6/18, when
> I first asked you to refund my money? All you had to do, and all you
> still have to do, is demonstrate that you're a legitimate and honest
> businessman. I've done nothing to you, but, up till now, you've only
> dealt dishonestly with me. I'm guessing you probably thought that just
> shipping the order anyway a couple of days ago, and ignoring my many
> cancellation requests, would somehow make things right, though I don't
> know why you would think so.
>
> Ed, for the millionth time, just send me my check and let's be done
> with this. The ball has always been in your court.
This is not the millionth time you have asked for a check. It is
exactly the second time. The first time was earlier today. You certain
deal in exaggerations and half truths. I have NOT dealt dishonestly
with you. You are just using this ng as a big crybaby sounding board,
thinking I would not answer. Well, I did break my word and answer, but
that's because you have slandered my name and that of my company. If
you think "disorganized mess" is complimentary, I suggest you look up
the meaning of the word. So, to use your arithmatic, for the millionth
time, this is not the place for this.
Ed